Politics of mockery: If you cannot beat him, laugh at him
In what is widely acclaimed as a reprieve to
Delhi's ruling Aam Admi Party government, the Delhi High Court last Friday set
aside the Election Commission of India's (ECI's) recommendation for disqualification of 20 of its MLAs for holding the
office of profit.
The issue in question arose when the government-appointed these
legislators as parliamentary secretaries to its ministers in March 2015. A
subsequent petition filed in June in the same year before the President
challenged the decision of the government. The government then swung into
action by enacting the Delhi Member of Legislative Assembly (Removal of
Disqualification) (Amendment Bill) 2015, excluding parliamentary secretaries
from the office of profit. The President denied assent to the
Bill and the ECI in this January decided in favor of the petitioners, upholding
the disqualification of the said legislators.
Article 102(1)(A) of the Indian Constitution bars an MP or an
MLA from holding any office of profit under the government of India or in any
state other than an office declared by the Parliament by law as not an office
of profit for its holder.
Thus the matter challenging the propriety of the ECI decision
came up before the Delhi High Court. A division bench of the court felt the ECI
should take a fresh look at the matter. It felt the MLAs' contention that they
were not given a proper hearing held good in law. MLAs had pleaded that this
was against the principles of natural justice, and the decision of the ECI was
ultra vires, unconstitutional and null and void in the eyes of law.
The relief for the Delhi government now is a huge one in as much
as Kejriwal and his team will stand justified in public eyes for their claim of
being victims to a malicious political game-plan. More so when a similar
situation earlier in Chhattisgarh was not met with a similar approach by the
ECI. Some of the former election commissioners joining the fray would only make
AAP's contentions stronger and legitimate in the citizens' view. Questions may
also arise about the undue haste with which the President's office dispose of
such an important constitutional question. It was reported that the decision on
a 132-page recommendation of the ECI was taken by his office the same day as it
was put up before him.
Visionary BR Ambedkar had an apprehension that we would go
astray on constitutional norms when the then-nascent nation would put a few
decades behind it. In his speech to the Constituent Assembly, he had warned of
this as early as 1948: "Constitutional morality is not a natural
sentiment. It has to be cultivated. We must realize that our people have yet to
learn it. Democracy in India is only top-dressing on Indian soil, which is
essentially undemocratic."
Unlike other traditional politicians, Kejriwal who started his
public life on a different note altogether, had hurdles aplenty ever since he
became the chief minister of Delhi. A tussle with the Centre over the choice of
appointing anti-corruption bureau (ACB) chief; ACB probing Deputy Chief
Minister Manish Sisodia for allegedly awarding government adverts to agencies
run by his relative (ACB has not found any evidence or filed FIR in this case);
and former LG Najeeb Jung quashing the appointment of DERC chief appointed by
the Kejriwal government may be a few cases to mention. Further, several of his
legislators were arrested on grounds that did not elicit similar responses in
similar cases elsewhere.
There were also issues such as law minister Jitender Singh Tomar
being arrested on the charge of forging his educational certificates and Bawana
MLA Ved Prakash joining BJP that caused embarrassment to the party leadership.
Another situation that caused much more discomfort for the party brass was
senior leader Kumar Vishwas's falling out with Kejriwal in April 2017.
The unfortunate incidents mentioned above are certainly not
unusual for any government. However, the treatment of this government by the
media and the other two major political parties is something totally
unprecedented in the history of Indian politics.
That the post of the chief minister of Delhi
is almost a titular one makes the job of Kejriwal's rivals easier. For Delhi is
yet not a full state and it is governed under Article 239AA of the Constitution
and the Government of National Capital Territory Act of 1991.
While we have had parties trying to rip each other apart by
bringing up false allegations, we are now seeing political parties playing what
may be best termed as the politics of mockery. Whatever Kejriwal did, there
would be a joke doing the rounds about it. Even such positive measures as 'Odd
and Even' became the butt of jokes. And the most unfortunate part is these
jokes are coming mostly from the political parties.
Above all are the concerted efforts of a large section of media
to portray him as a laughing stock. At the behest of rival politicians across
party lines and those in the corporate world, a dedicated brigade is at work on
social media to malign him to hilt too. And they can be seen crossing all
limits of propriety. Schadenfreude may not have a better example!
Ask a Congress party worker about Kejriwal and instead of
criticizing AAP policies, the person would say: But who takes Kejriwal
seriously? The answer would be no different if you put the same question to a
BJP worker.
In a way, the two rival parties don't see eye to eye on anything
but Kejriwal. Looks like the game is: If you cannot beat him, mock him. The CM
of the most important state of the country looks like a joker to everyone, and
your job is done. You don't need to do anything else to take away from his
political credentials. You reduce his vision to a clown's whims/eccentricities,
and you have almost won the battle.
You laugh at his muffler but nobody points out the educational
reforms that the AAP government has introduced in the state. You make fun of
his coughing problem but no one would ever say: But he has come up with an
almost path-breaking concept of mohalla clinics. No one would ever challenge
your stupidity of making fun of a political opponent in the absence of a
substantial political criticism on your part.
In a serious democracy, the politics of mockery would not have a
place. But that is about a serious democracy. We don't have a taste for
serious, constructive criticism. Having been fed a staple diet of empty
rhetoric, we seldom understand the importance of vision in politics. Tall talk
is something we have been brought up on, and tall talk is all we understand.
I am trying to understand the reason that brings both BJP and
Congress together when they find an opportunity to be up in arms against
Kejriwal.
Kejriwal speaks the language of the common man, he has small
visions for the small but essential needs of the common man. He promises water,
electricity, shelter, education while the other parties promise the moon.
When you promise the moon, you know very well you don't need to
fulfil your promises, because they are unfulfillable. When you promise the
basic essentials, you not only need to fulfil the promises but you also can
and do fulfil those promises.
Herein lies the problem. In a country where politics has come to
mean control, it would be suicidal to fulfil the basic needs of the people.
You can control people when they have to beg before you for even their basic
needs. Your only mantra is to keep your people powerless because
that empowers you.
In a country like ours, Kejriwal can be a big threat for those
who believe in control. In fact, the frightened mainstream politicians can best
be compared with the elite in the British era who felt threatened when they
learned that the lower castes will have to be included in the stream of
education. They could see their powers slipping out of their hands the way the
mainstream politicians feel today in the face of Kejriwal.
Kejriwal does not offer the moon but he is a haystack in the
floods for the common man, and it is important that this haystack is not swept
away by the politics of mockery.
Politics of mockery: If you cannot beat him, laugh at him - IBTimes India
Comments
Post a Comment